Atheism
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Occam's razor''' tells us a simple explanation with few assumptions is more likely to be true. If something could have happened in several different ways, a way with few guesses is more likely to be correct than a way with many guesses. Of course if a complex explanation works better than a simple explanation we take the complex explanation seriously. <ref>[http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor Occam's razor]</ref>
+
'''Occam's razor''' tells us a simple explanation with few assumptions is more likely to be true. If something could have happened in several different ways, a way with few guesses is more likely to be correct than a way with many guesses. Of course if a complex explanation works better than a simple explanation we take the complex explanation seriously.
  +
  +
==Example===
  +
One or more trees fell down during a storm, which is more likely?
  +
#The storm blew the trees over.
  +
#A low flying Alien spacecraft knocked them down and afterwards the [[w:c:liberapedia:Intelligent aliens|Space aliens]] used their superior technology to eliminate all other traces of their visit.
  +
Both could theoretically happen, still we have no evidence:
  +
#That aliens visit the earth
  +
#That they knock trees down
  +
#That they remove evidence of their visits.
  +
The space alien explanation involves three improbable assumptions.
  +
We know that heavy wind sometimes blows trees over.
  +
Since the first explanation needs several assumptions to all be true, it is probably the wrong answer. Occam's razor tells us that the wind blew the trees down, because that is the simplest answer and therefore probably the right one.<ref>[http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor Occam's razor]</ref>
   
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 16:11, 16 February 2014

Occam's razor tells us a simple explanation with few assumptions is more likely to be true. If something could have happened in several different ways, a way with few guesses is more likely to be correct than a way with many guesses. Of course if a complex explanation works better than a simple explanation we take the complex explanation seriously.

Example=

One or more trees fell down during a storm, which is more likely?

  1. The storm blew the trees over.
  2. A low flying Alien spacecraft knocked them down and afterwards the Space aliens used their superior technology to eliminate all other traces of their visit.

Both could theoretically happen, still we have no evidence:

  1. That aliens visit the earth
  2. That they knock trees down
  3. That they remove evidence of their visits.

The space alien explanation involves three improbable assumptions. We know that heavy wind sometimes blows trees over. Since the first explanation needs several assumptions to all be true, it is probably the wrong answer. Occam's razor tells us that the wind blew the trees down, because that is the simplest answer and therefore probably the right one.[1]

References